Do you know which is the most confused creature on the planet? Well, it is a law student. Whether he is sitting in an examination hall or on his desk at home, he's always found staring at the walls blankly in confusion. Wondering why is he so perplexed? Well, while writing an exam as well as an assignment, a common thought troubles him. Pondering, what? He thinks, "I don't know how to answer a law case, how to complete the task? What if I fail in completing it?"
Is this student looking familiar? Oh! Is that you? You are also here in the need of business law assignment help for the same reason, right? Well, throw all your worries out of the mind. Why? This is so because today we will ease all your concerns. Thinking how? We'll do so by acquainting you with the best method to answer the law questions. If you use this technique in the assignment, then the professor cannot stop himself from rewarding you an A+.
Excited to know it, right? Well, this technique is known as CRRACC. Scratching your head thinking what it is? Don’t scratch the head, focus it on this write-up. Here we are decoding it.
C: The character “C” stands for conclusion
R: The letter “R” represents rule
R: The consonant “R” implies rule proof
A: The vowel “A” depicts application
C: The syllabary “C” denotes counterargument
C: The alphabet “C” means conclusion
Two conclusions, Three C, and Two R, what’s all this? I got even more confused. This is what you are thinking, right? Well, do not fret. Here we are explaining each of these elements in detail. Go through this explanation thoroughly to understand them.
Element # 1 Conclusion
What do you comprehend by the term conclusion? Well, it is a summary of what you understand about a particular topic. This element also implies the same thing. Here you need to write what is your prima facie opinion of the case. Describe the background information and which is the strong party based on it. For example, if the case law question is regarding a dispute between a company and its employee, then explain the company’s nature and what do you think about the employee after studying the available information.
Element # 2 Rule
This is the easiest element. How? Well, here you are only required to open your business law textbook and identify the legal provision applicable to the present case. Why? Well, this is because the parties knock the court's door when they think a particular rule has been violated by one of them. Talking about our example, you need to mention what section of Australia's Corporate Law applies to the present situation.
Element # 3 Rule Proof
What's the life of an advocate? He proves himself while studying, then after completing his studies too, the court demands proof from him. This proofing cycle never ends. And, the assignments are assigned for the same reason, i.e., to prepare you for this advocate's life. Here in this part also, you need to prove why do you think a particular provision applies to the assignment's case law. How to do this? Well, simply cite an already decided case law having similar circumstances. In our example, you can talk about any previous case where the plaintiff, defendant, and the issue between them were analogous to the present case.
Element # 4 Application
Now that you have mentioned the rule and proved why do you think it applies to your question, you're required to describe how it can be applied. For doing that, relate the circumstances to the provision. Talking about our example, if the cause of the dispute is the expulsion of the employee, then you can say, "Section X of Corporate law describes the conditions of employment. In a similar case, where the facts and circumstances were identical, the court made a verdict based on this section".
Element # 5 Counterargument
Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. Similarly, every argument has a counterargument. If you want to strengthen your position, then you must nullify the counterarguments' impact by addressing it well in advance. In our example, if your argument is in favor of the employee, then you need to answer the question "mostly the companies expel the employees who are guilty of misconduct, here also as the company has expelled the employee, then how can you say it has not misconducted?"
Element # 6 Conclusion
Hey, Mr. Future lawyer, do not get confused. This conclusion is not the same as the first one. In that part, you've given your prima facie opinion but here you need to give the final verdict. This last element requires you to explain what do you think the decision of the case should be and why. Coming to our example, write whether the judgment should be in favor of the defendant or plaintiff. You can take the help of a previously decided court case for doing this.
Now that we have acquainted you with the best method to write the business law assignment, we hope getting your dream grade has become easier. But, if it still seems difficult, then instead of wasting your valuable time, contact us for the assignment writing help.